Know whether your workforce can work with AI responsibly.

AI is being deployed faster than people learn to use, supervise and challenge it. RCM ThinkLabs measures that gap.

For the Chief AI Officer

RCM ThinkLabs measures whether people can specify the right problem, verify AI output and exercise sound judgment when AI is confident but wrong, and develops those capabilities through recurring immersive micro-sessions.

Beyond tool adoption

Adoption metrics count usage. They miss discernment.

Adoption metricThe capability question behind it
Seats activeAre people framing the problem before they prompt?
Prompts per userDo they check output against evidence, or accept it?
Time savedDo they catch a confident error under time pressure?
User satisfactionDo they escalate when uncertainty is high?
Agent tasks completedDoes a named person own, and defend, the decision?
What you get

Readiness you can show the board.

  • An AI workforce readiness baseline in 30 days, measured in behavior rather than self-report.
  • Evidence of human oversight whether people verify consequential output and escalate uncertainty.
  • AI discernment knowing when to trust, check or override AI, tracked over time.
  • Human-agent collaboration delegation, context and accountability as agents take on work.
  • Responsible AI as observed behavior what people actually do, next to what policy asks.
  • Less offloading of judgment people practice forming a view before they read the output.
The framework

Specification, Verification, Conviction.

Three questions that decide whether AI makes a team sharper or faster at being wrong.

01

Specification

Can people define what matters before asking AI, or anyone else, to act?

  • Problem framing
  • Clear communication
  • Context setting
  • Constraint definition
  • Asking the right question
  • Signal from noise

Without it: vague in, vague out. AI answers the question it was given, not the one that mattered.

Explore specification →
02

Verification

Can people tell whether an answer, recommendation or assumption holds up?

  • Critical thinking
  • Evidence evaluation
  • Assumption testing
  • Contradiction detection
  • Systems thinking
  • Second-order effects
  • Recognizing uncertainty

Without it: review becomes a rubber stamp on generated text.

Explore verification →
03

Conviction

Can people make and defend a justified decision, and still update when the evidence changes?

  • Decision quality
  • Leadership judgment
  • Persuasion
  • Negotiation
  • Accountable action
  • Updating on evidence

Without it: the model decides, and nobody owns the call.

Explore conviction →
Due diligence

Built to pass security review.

Runs in the browser with nothing to install. No integration is required. Each client runs in its own isolated environment and client data never mixes.

Security, privacy and deployment →

Evidence

Evidence from production

Figures from production, measured against each person's own opening baseline.

84%of regular participants improved, on a full read.
15,000+decisions scored across 1,088 sessions.
70%played daily. Nobody was assigned.
375+reads per person.

Measure whether your workforce can work with AI responsibly.

Comparing options? See how RCM ThinkLabs compares with Workera, Viva Insights and other alternatives.